Using AI at a South African university: reading the rules

If you are unsure whether you may use AI in an assignment, you are not alone, and the answer is rarely a simple yes or no. This article explains where to look and how to read what you find.

Start with the most specific rule

The rule that governs your assignment is usually the most specific one that exists. In order:

1. The assessment brief or rubric for this task.
2. The module or course outline.
3. Your faculty or school guidance.
4. The institution-wide academic integrity or plagiarism policy.

If they disagree, the more specific document normally wins. If you are still unsure, ask your lecturer in writing and keep the reply.

What most policies allow and prohibit

Policies differ between institutions, faculties and even modules, and they change often. Treat this as a map, not a rulebook. Most published guidance sorts AI use into three groups:

• Usually allowed: brainstorming, explaining a difficult reading, checking grammar and spelling, and suggesting a structure that you then write yourself.
• Usually allowed if you declare it: help with paraphrasing or summarising, feedback on your draft, and translating your own notes.
• Usually not allowed: submitting AI-written text as your own, citing sources you haven’t read, and any AI use in closed-book or invigilated assessments.

Your module guide has the final word. If it says nothing, ask your lecturer.

When in doubt, disclose

A short, accurate description of how you used AI protects you far better than silence. Our free guide shows you how to write one.